During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Фото: Валерий Мельников / РИА Новости
，详情可参考Line官方版本下载
Author(s): Seyed Mahdi Mastoor, Ayda Baghervand, Amirhossein Ahmadkhan Kordbacheh。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
公司高增长背后的多重风险正逐步显现。业务结构失衡问题尤为突出，电动两轮车占比过高，而割草机器人、全地形车等新业务虽增速迅猛，但 2024 年智能服务机器人业务收入占比仅 6.3%，难以分担核心业务的增长压力。当前电动两轮车行业已进入存量竞争，2025 年行业增速回落至 5% 以下，高端市场渗透率接近饱和，而九号在下沉市场的渗透率仅 3%-4%，渠道结构失衡导致其错失最大增量市场。
Lex: FT's flagship investment column